social networking

Social Networking 101 – Web 2.0 And Social Networks

The first thing we need to focus on here is that social networking is NOT something new, nor does it define the recent Web 2.0 craze in any way.


In fact the whole concept of what Web 2.0 really means has been so widely distorted that many marketers and web designers are now using it to help promote products and services that have NOTHING to do with what Web 2.0 really means.


Even the ever popular Wikipedia defines Web 2.0 as “a perceived second generation of web-based communities and hosted services (such as social-networking sites, wikis, blogs, and folksonomies) which aim to facilitate creativity, collaboration, and sharing between users”. You’ll notice that the term “perceived” is one of first words used, as much of what we have come to believe is reality is based on our perception, but in truth social networking is far more than that.


To show this Wikipedia further goes on to say; “Although the term suggests a new version of the World Wide Web, it does not refer to an update to any technical specifications, but to changes in the ways software developers and end-users use webs. Web 2.0 is the business revolution in the computer industry caused by the move to the Internet as platform, and an attempt to understand the rules for success on that new platform.”


Summing up the last two statements from Wikipedia you’ll notice that social networking and the social networks and platforms are not anything new. What is new and what does feed in to the Web 2.0 craze that has recently made many of these social networks so popular is the easy to use platforms that allows the end user access to a WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get) graphic user interface once they sign up and log in to their favorite social networking websites.


Again the concept here is NOT new. Social networks have existed since the early days of the internet with bulletin boards, which later lead to the early days of what we now call blogging and forums. You could post your message to viewers back then, just as you can now. The difference with social networking today when using the new WYSIWYG platform is that you can now easily add your own images, animations, videos, audios, squeeze pages (for lead generation to build an email list) and polls. Depending on which of social networks that you join the possibilities are stammering compared to the “old way” of social networking online.


To show that social networking and the social networks are not new by any means I have done just a little bit of research to reveal how far back many of these websites go.


MySpace – Registered Feb. 22 1996


Friendster – Registered March 22 2002


FaceBook – Registered March 29 1997


MyYearBook – Registered Nov. 01 2000


Hi5 – Registered June 27 1996


Tagged – Registered July 10 1998


Fubar – Registered Oct. 24 1997


Taking this same concept more in to the Web 2.0 era the social networking website have created a multitude of video oriented social networks, but again this is nothing new.


YouTube – Registered Feb. 15 2005


Badoo – Registered May 26 2003


Bebo – Registered July 15 2003


As you can tell YouTube was NOT the first to start the video social networking niche. While I only have two listed below YouTube in my list about there were several other social networks that also came along well before they did. The one thing that the creators of YouTube did better than any of the others that came before them was to actually TAKE ACTION and use the social networking skills that everyone else was trying to claim they were experts at.


I’m sure that what they did was to research their niche, where they probably learned the same things that I did. Most of the social networking website that were trying to establish their own on-site social networks were NOT just registering their own websites for 1 or 2 years. In fact, many of them are registered at least until 2010. Some of them are registered even further out and have their own servers that are dedicated ONLY to their social networking websites to give the various social networks that are developed a better quality of service.


Why are they doing this you may ask? Because the advertising revenue brought in alone for them is so high that they can’t turn away from it. With millions upon millions of people world wide going to their websites 24 hours a day they are making money hand over fist, much the same way that the search engines were long before they came along.


This brings us to another point, let us look at the “big three”; Google, Yahoo! and MSN, which laid the foreground for the social networking websites that came after them. There have been social networks since long before the search engines first decided to set up their “groups”, but taking people off of bulletin boards and bringing them in to the mainstream where here were literally millions of visitors daily was a no brainer. The transition was easily predictable, but again this goes back to what I’ve been saying all along. Social networking, social networks and what we have come to know as Web 2.0 are nothing new.

Tags: , ,

What Social Networking Should Have Been?

Recently, a lot of people have been feeling the pain that is social networking. By pain, I am referring to losing many freedoms that come with having a social networking profile.


Let’s take for instance the average social networking website, you signup, make a profile, add some friends (people you may or may not even know), and then you are connected to this huge community (schools, cities, sometimes the entire network).


This information is all logged in most social networking websites, thanks to web crawlers, advertisers, and many other spammers. Your own social being is threatened, and your privacy is threatened as well. Can you escape the grasp of a social network after you leave it? In most cases, it is more difficult than you think.


Not to mention the flaws of identity theft in social networking, picture stealing, and all kinds of other serious flaws with social networking.


I too have had a less than pleasant experience involving social networking involving people stalking me, and the deletion of an account that never actually really got deleted, also, the constant influx of seriously disturbing messages and random rants of people you care less about.


I have been involved with several social networking sites personally, as a user, and I have to admit that most of them are less than par.


What should social networking be? I have worked to try and figure out a system that would be an optimum system of social networking, and it does fall quite a bit away from the current spectrum of social networking.


Social Networks: In the past they have always been developer created. You were either forced into a group, that may not fit your best interests or you were placed in a network that wasn’t verifiably something that you wanted to be part of.


I mean do you really care that you can chat with a million people that you will never be involved in? I didn’t think so.


What they should have been? A complete user defined network, where the person creates/joins a network of their friends/acquaintances, and your friends will invite their friends, and it would grow from there, so you would mainly be talking with/communicating with ‘trusted’ individuals that are friends of friends, or people with some relation to you through friends.


Meeting random people off the internet is not what many people are about, and if people are looking to do that, then there are thousands of other sites were you can do exactly that.


The following is a great example of what I am talking about: [http://epicka.com/how.html]


Preferences: Most current dating/networking sites leave a lot of security unaccounted for. They let your profile visible to be logged by bots (record everything about you for search/advertising purposes) logged by advertisers, logged by spammers, and in many cases: direct spam directly through your profile. This isn’t good. Having to worry about possibly getting spammed and your privacy threatened. This wasn’t what I signed up for when I signed up for social networking.


This is your life we are talking about and the security of your profile and everything to do with the profile should be completely in regards to you. You shouldn’t be told what you can/can’t share, what you can/can’t add, and it should be as completely open or closed as you want it to be.


It is your social network, so you should be able to make it your network.


Features: Right now there are quite a few strict things that you can do on a social networking, and it is pretty much limited to a few things. You can do the following on almost every social network:


* mail people


* post comments


* post pictures


* chat in forums


* chat


That’s basically the most that I have found of use on social networking, all other features: blogging, playing games, posting bulletins, posting in classifieds.


I have found much better places that I can do all of these things, but the thing is when I social network, I can’t really ‘share’ what I am looking to share with my friends because too many random people will have access to the things that I want to keep private from others.


After researching and doing a lot of digging, I have been developing a site that implements all these features that I have found that are really significantly needed in a social networking site. I am working to develop not only these things, but a ton of other things that you can do with your social network, which includes just a hint of what I am thinking of developing:


* File sharing with friends.


* Your music sharing with friends. Your music. Your movies. (Think video sharing on a closed network for just you and your friends, and also having your bands music posted for your friends)


* Info Exchange, working on projects for high school, college, university, work, life, and want your friends input on what you should do, they can help you and you can help them through the network to conspire and get amazing grades.


* Global and your network news aggregation, got some amazing news that you want to tell just your friends, or the entire world? You can post it.


* User defined search engine, users submit the sites, vote on the sites, and the sites are adjusted for your preferences.


* Personal preferences that let you keep your words private, just for your network, or the entire world? You can pick them.


This is only a short list of some of the projects that we are, and will be working on. There will be lots of new projects that we will be adding in the coming months.


Please visit us at [http://www.epicka.com] and signup for a free account.

Tags: , ,

Can You Make Money With Social Networks?

Social Networks gather people with common interests and many people enjoy being part of a large network of friends and future friends. Social networks actively promote people to join so that they can increase their clout with online advertisers. These Social Networks make large amounts of money from the advertisers that want to get their products and services in front of all of these people.


This is why most Social Networks provide splendid high tech features such as discussion groups, video email, online social games, photo albums, contests, and many more exciting things to come. They create a virtual mall of fun things to do so people will not only visit but stay for long periods of time. The longer a person stays on a website, the more opportunity there is for the advertisers to place their ad in front of more people. This is referred to as the “Stickiness” of a website.


But there are other good reasons for people to use social networks as well. Networking is a way for business people to meet prospective clients, partners, and customers in a friendly social way and this has always proven to be lucrative. This is similar to the reason why many companies provide tee times for their employees who are entertaining clients – it is a way to personalize a meeting during a friendly round of golf. Thus if you have a business, being socially active can make you money.


These attributes of social networking have been very successful in recent times for increasing the number of people gathering on these social network sites. However, competition in this ‘niche’ is growing and will continue to grow. A new niche is needed.


Most business must spend money not only to start up but also to grow the number of customers they have. Social Networks do advertise in their infancy to gain members and this usually puts them further in the “red” until they can persuade enough people to join for companies seeking good advertising opportunities to pay them for the ad space. Many companies of all types commonly must spend upwards of 70% of their revenue to maintain and grow their business. If this money is paid to advertising agencies, it only benefits a limited number of people.


Enter the “monetized” social network. Since most businesses in the world are very happy if they can make a 30% profit, why not pass 70% of the advertising revenue back to the members of the social network? Base the amount of revenue each member receives on the amount of members they bring into the membership and you have a viral team of social net-workers who are being paid to increase the number of people in the network. Instead of paying for advertisements to get people to come to their website, the members become the advertisers and are compensated for their efforts. Also, since the advertisers who would pay this social networking site for hosting their ads is willing to pay the going rate for internet advertising, both the 70% share being passed back to the members and the 30% profit for the social networking site owners grows proportionally with the growth of the membership. If you can find a social network like this, wouldn’t you rather be a member there instead of Facebook, Twitter, or MySpace who keep all the profits for themselves and take advantage of the very lucrative services their members provide them?


The business model of this monetized social network could be structured to reward those who work the hardest to bring new people to the website. After all, this is how money is made on the internet. So imagine if you developed a method to track both how much each member views the advertisements on the website and how many people they have invited who join the network, how this could provide the basis of a commission structure that would be fair and equitable.


Consider a commission structure in a simple database that tracks who invites who and places the new people in a structure under the person who invited them. Assume that membership at this social network is free. Now imagine a common multiplication of people due to all being rewarded for bringing new people. Say Joe invites 10 of his friends to join and provides them with a link. These 10 friends join because they like Joe and they have common interests together. Each of these 10 friends have 10 friends who want to join them also. Now there are 100 people under Joe and Joe is being rewarded a portion of the advertising revenue for 100 people and he only invited 10 of them. Of course, those 100 people could have 10 friends each that they invite and the numbers of people now under Joe are 1000 and this continues. Joe only invited 10 but there is nothing to stop him from inviting far more and he continues to be rewarded for bringing new people to the website. This is the real power of social networking which will dominate the industry very soon.


Each member is paid based on the amount of time they spend on the social networking site doing the things we all do such as clicking advertisements (just window shopping), doing searches, checking our email, playing games, interacting with our friends, and making new friends. The social network could also provide volume discounts to its members through their advertisers so the members can save money on the products they buy. Thus each member shares revenue in one case by the time they spend accessing the website. The other stream of income is from a commission a member gets for bringing the new people onto the site..


You can do the math. For instance, just use 5% of the total revenue generated by Joe’s 10 (plus) people he invited himself, and use 2% of everyone they invited down to 6 levels below Joe. Using the example, if Joe’s group expanded to 6 levels, there may be 1 million people under Joe. Considering that there are over 1.7 Billion people using the internet and this number is increasing every day, how hard is that to believe?


Also, to get a group of more committed people to get involved, you offer a premium level membership to some. This is a normal business method to employ leaders who can help manage and promote the groups who will come. But instead of being free, you charge $200 USD so that you only allow people who can commit to an idea and make a sound decision to join in that level. Right at first, you will need many of these types of people but once they have established themselves, you would close this level of membership until the size of the groups demanded more leadership or training. So you compensate these special premium members with say, 20% of their directly sponsored member’s revenue and 6% of of the revenue generated by the people they sponsor down to 6 levels.


A plan such as this would expand the social network quickly and probably dominate the niche in just a short time.


So, can you make money with Social Networks? Yes, and Social Networking on the Internet is ripe for just such a business plan.

Tags: , ,